8.6 Blackout vs .338 Lapua: Which One Wins?

Hunting with Firearms
1

When it comes to choosing between the 8.6 Blackout and the .338 Lapua, there are a lot of considerations to keep in mind, especially if you are into hunting or precision shooting. Both cartridges have their unique strengths, and understanding these can help you decide which one might be best for your needs.

Overview of 8.6 Blackout

The 8.6 Blackout is a relatively new cartridge designed for short-barreled rifles and suppressor use. It’s essentially tailored for tactical shooting and versatility in various hunting scenarios. Here are some key features:

  • Caliber: .338
  • Effective Range: It performs well at ranges up to 600 yards, making it suitable for intermediate distances.
  • Recoil: Designed to have manageable recoil, which can be a major advantage in quick follow-up shots.
  • Ballistic Performance: With subsonic options, it remains relatively quiet, making it ideal for stealthy hunts.

Overview of .338 Lapua

On the other hand, the .338 Lapua is a powerhouse cartridge known for its exceptional long-range performance. Used by military and law enforcement, it’s also popular among long-range enthusiasts. Here’s what sets it apart:

  • Caliber: .338
  • Effective Range: Capable of accurate shots over 1,500 yards; it excels in long-range scenarios.
  • Recoil: Higher recoil compared to the 8.6 Blackout, which can affect shooting comfort and speed during rapid fire.
  • Ballistic Performance: With a flatter trajectory and more energy at distance, it’s an excellent choice for taking down large game at long ranges.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature 8.6 Blackout .338 Lapua
Effective Range Up to 600 yards Over 1,500 yards
Recoil Manageable Heavy
Use Case Tactical & Hunting Long-range Precision
Bullet Options Subsonic available High velocity options

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between the 8.6 Blackout and the .338 Lapua ultimately depends on your intended use. If you’re looking for something versatile with manageable recoil for closer hunting, the 8.6 Blackout might just be your best bet. However, if your goal is to engage targets at extreme ranges and take on large game, then the .338 Lapua is hard to beat.

What are your experiences with these cartridges? Any preferences or recommendations on specific scenarios where one may be favored over the other? Let’s dive into the discussion!

2

The 8.6 Blackout is designed for versatility in close to medium ranges. It offers decent muzzle energy and can be quite effective in CQB scenarios.

3

True, but the .338 Lapua really shines at long distances. Its ballistic coefficient is impressive, making it ideal for sniping.

4

I agree with heidi80! The .338 Lapua has an effective range of up to 1,500 meters, while the 8.6 Blackout is more suited for around 300 meters or so. That’s a big difference!

5

However, for home defense or hunting in dense forest, the 8.6 Blackout’s stopping power in a compact design can’t be overlooked. It seems to suit many practical applications.

6

That’s true! The versatility of the 8.6 gives it an edge in situations where mobility is key. Anyone tried both? What’s your take?

7

I’ve shot both and found the .338 Lapua is truly a beast for long-range accuracy, but the 8.6 Blackout was surprisingly fun to shoot off-hand.

8

Judging by performance metrics, I’d say it comes down to your specific use case. An urban setup might favor the 8.6, while open terrain could favor the .338.

9

I’m new to the world of ballistics. What’s the practical difference in muzzle energy between both calibers? This seems crucial for making a choice.

10

In simple terms, the .338 Lapua delivers 4,000 J of energy, whereas the 8.6 peaks around 2,500 J. Quite the disparity!

11

I can’t help but chuckle: it really feels like bringing a helicopter to a knife fight when comparing these two! The .338 is overkill for most scenarios.

7 Likes
12

A great point, ukaufman! Sometimes, overkill can actually be a safety net. But when do we decide if it’s too much?

13

That’s what makes this discussion so interesting! The choice isn’t just about numbers; it’s all about context and preference. Both calibers have their merits!

14

I’ve been following the development of the 8.6 Blackout, and it’s interesting how it’s tailored for specific tactical applications. What do you all think about its potential range compared to the .338 Lapua?

3 Likes
15

It’s definitely a game-changer for close to mid-range scenarios. The .338 Lapua tends to dominate in long-range capabilities, though. That’s where its heavy projectiles shine, especially in open terrain.

1 Like
16

From a hunting perspective, I think the 8.6 Blackout could be a great choice for whitetail in the woods. The suppressed options let you stay stealthy, unlike the booming .338 Lapua.

5 Likes
17

Absolutely! The 8.6’s suppression is a massive advantage in tactical uses too. It’s quieter, which can really help in scenarios where noise discipline is key.

18

While I appreciate the versatility of the 8.6, don’t forget the immense stopping power of the .338 Lapua. It’s truly designed for taking down large game at impressive ranges.

2 Likes
19

I’m curious, what’s the cost difference between the .338 Lapua and the 8.6 Blackout ammunition? I’m all about efficiency and cost-effectiveness in my shooting.

1 Like
20

The .338 Lapua can be pretty pricey, especially for quality ammo. The 8.6 Blackout tends to be more budget-friendly, making it a more accessible option for casual shooters.