That sounds impressive! But isn’t it a bit alarming that it’s so lightweight? I wonder how durable it really is if it’s knocked around.
I’ve dropped mine a couple of times, and it held up fine. No scratches or performance issues! Just pure luck, I guess!
3 Likes
I’ve been using the Vortex Ranger 1300 for a few months now and it performs great for the price. The clarity and distance aren’t comparable to the higher-end brands but it’s solid for hunting.
That’s good to hear! I’ve been considering it over the Bushnell Trophy Xtreme. What do you think differentiates their performance?
In my experience, the Vortex Ranger 1300 has excellent value for money. However, if you’re looking for more advanced features, you might want to check the Leupold RX-1300i, albeit at a higher cost.
I’ve heard good things about both but I found Leupold a bit too pricey. Vortex seems to hit that sweet spot in terms of quality versus cost, especially for beginners.
3 Likes
The advanced features on the Leupold do sound tempting, but I love the simplicity of the Ranger 1300 for my in-the-field needs.
7 Likes
Honestly, I’ve used the Ranger 1300 during deer season and it performed exceptionally well in low light. It’s a great option if you’re not looking to break the bank.
I personally prefer my Nikon Prostaff 1000 over the Vortex. It just seems a bit more reliable for tracking the moving targets, but that’s just my view.
3 Likes
That’s interesting! I always thought Nikon was good for tracking. Did you see a notable difference in clarity or speed between the two rangefinders?
As for me, my buddy has a Vortex and swears by it, but I ended up with a Sig Sauer Kilo 1250. If you can stretch your budget a little, the Sig has a solid reputation.
That’s good advice! Sometimes a little extra investment pays off in the long run. Which features do you love the most about the Sig?