Looking for Insights on the Smith and Wesson 629-3

I’m considering adding the Smith and Wesson 629-3 to my collection and would love to hear experiences and insights from other firearm enthusiasts.

Specifications & Features

From what I’ve gathered, the 629-3 is a robust revolver, known for its durability and performance. Here are some specifics I’m curious about:

  • Caliber: 44 Magnum, which is perfect for both hunting and target shooting.
  • Barrel Length Options: What barrel lengths do you recommend? I’ve seen models ranging from 4 inches to 6.5 inches.
  • Finish: I believe it typically comes with a stainless steel finish, but are there any other options or customizations?

Performance in the Field

I’m particularly interested in hearing how it performs:

  • Recoil Management: Is it manageable for extended shooting sessions?
  • Accuracy: How does it hold up at various ranges, especially for hunting?
  • Reliability: Any issues with jamming or other common problems?

Value and Collection

Finally, I would appreciate your thoughts on:

  • Market Value: How does the pricing generally run? Is it worth the investment?
  • Aesthetics: How does the 629-3 compare visually to other revolvers?

Feel free to share any personal stories, photos, or tips on maintenance as well. Looking forward to your feedback!

I’ve had my Smith and Wesson 629-3 for a couple of years now. The accuracy is impressive, and I’ve had tight groups at 25 yards. The recoil is manageable, especially with the right handloads.

2 Likes

That’s great to hear! I’d love to know what loads you typically use to keep the recoil down. Any recommendations?

5 Likes

I’ve experimented with different loads as well. A lighter bullet with more powder seems to help with both accuracy and felt recoil. The 629-3 also handles .44 Special loads really well for practice.

I find the handling of the 629-3 to be very comfortable, partly due to the rubber grips. They help with recoil and provide a secure grip, even in wet conditions.

Absolutely, those grips can make a significant difference! I’d also suggest practicing double-action shooting to get a better feel for the trigger. It can be a bit heavy at first, though.

6 Likes

Does anyone else have issues with the front sight on the 629-3? I feel like it could be more pronounced for better visibility.

I had the same concern! A simple solution I found was to use some bright paint or a fiber optic sight for better visibility.

That’s a clever idea! I’ll definitely try that. As for recoil, I’ve seen some folks use a compensator on theirs—has anyone tried that?

I haven’t used one, but I’ve read mixed reviews. Some say it helps with follow-up shots, while others claim it adds unnecessary weight. Personal preferences matter!

2 Likes

For me, the 629-3’s balance is spot on, and I don’t find it too heavy even after a long day shooting. It’s like wielding a piece of art!

That’s true! The craftsmanship is underrated. Plus, owning a revolver like the 629-3 is a unique experience. You really feel the strength of the .44 Magnum.

Haha, true! I sometimes feel like a cowboy! But seriously, does anyone find it challenging to reload fast?

5 Likes

Reloading can be tricky! I suggest practicing with speed loaders. It takes practice, but it can shave off time significantly!

I’ve been thinking of getting a 629-3. Is there a lot of difference between the 629-2 and 629-3 models? Anyone experienced both?

From what I’ve seen, the main difference is the changes in the internal mechanisms and some safety features. The 629-3 has a better trigger, but both are solid.

Thanks for clarifying! I appreciate all the insights here. You’ve all been super helpful!

I’ve owned the Smith and Wesson 629-3 for about five years. It’s been incredibly reliable, even in harsh conditions. Just make sure to clean it regularly, especially after using it outdoors.

What kind of harsh conditions are you talking about? I’m curious if it’s held up during extended outdoor use.

The 629-3 is known for its durability. I’ve noticed slight wear on the finish after a lot of use, but it’s mostly cosmetic. Internally, it’s still smooth as butter!

1 Like