Kimber Micro 9 vs Glock 43: Which One is Better for Carry?

Introduction

When it comes to concealed carry firearms, the Kimber Micro 9 and Glock 43 often come up in discussions among gun enthusiasts. Both compact pistols offer unique features, advantages, and a touch of personal flair, but which one is truly the better option for everyday carry?

In this post, I aim to gather some feedback and hear from anyone who has experience with either of these firearms. Knowing how they stack up against each other could really help in making an informed choice.

Performance Comparison

Handling

  • Kimber Micro 9: The Micro 9 is known for its smooth handling and a trigger pull that many users find more appealing than Glock’s. With its lighter weight and smaller size, it often feels more comfortable in hand.
  • Glock 43: The Glock 43 typically boasts a reputation for reliability. Many users comment on how it handles recoil very well, making it easier to control, especially for a 9mm. However, it’s slightly bulkier than the Micro 9.

Reliability

  • Kimber Micro 9: Kimber has a stellar reputation, but some users report occasional issues with specific types of ammunition. It’s crucial to test your preferred ammo.
  • Glock 43: Glock is synonymous with reliability. The Glock 43 tends to function flawlessly with a wide variety of ammunition, lending it an edge in this category.

Specifications Overview

  • Kimber Micro 9:

    • Caliber: 9mm
    • Capacity: 7+1 rounds
    • Weight: Approximately 15.6 oz (unloaded)
    • Barrel Length: 3.15 inches
  • Glock 43:

    • Caliber: 9mm
    • Capacity: 6+1 rounds
    • Weight: Approximately 16.19 oz (unloaded)
    • Barrel Length: 3.39 inches

User Experience

Many preferences boil down to personal experience and what you prioritize in a firearm.

  • Comfort: For those who prioritize comfort and aesthetics, the Kimber Micro 9’s design may appeal more. It’s often favored by those who appreciate a traditional 1911-style pistol.
  • Everyday Carry: On the other hand, if reliability and ease of use in different conditions matter more, the Glock 43 has a solid reputation in self-defense situations.

Conclusion

The ultimate decision often rests on individual needs, preferences, and intended use. What do you think? Do you have hands-on experience with either the Kimber Micro 9 or the Glock 43? Which firearm do you prefer and why? Any personal insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated! Looking forward to your feedback.

Key Points to Discuss:

  • Handling and comfort during extended carry
  • Reliability with different ammunition types
  • Personal stories that shaped your choice

Let’s hear your thoughts!

I’ve shot both the Kimber Micro 9 and Glock 43, and for accuracy, the Micro 9 has a slight edge. Its trigger feels smoother in comparison. However, recoil management is fantastic on both, though Glock’s polymer frame absorbs it a bit better under rapid fire.

8 Likes

I agree! I’ve found that in self-defense scenarios, quick shots are easier with the Micro 9. The grip provides a comfortable hold, allowing for faster follow-up shots.

Both firearms are reliable, but I’ve had a couple of jams with the Micro 9 during extended sessions. Has anyone else experienced that? The Glock has been flawless for me, rain or shine.

4 Likes

I’ve only used the Glock 43 in tough conditions, and it never failed me. It seems to be designed for those rough scenarios.

4 Likes

Comparing recoil, I’d say both control it well, but the Glock’s frame allows you to fire multiple rounds with less fatigue. I’ve tested both, and the stability of the Glock really shines.

Exactly! But the Kimber has a certain charm, especially for concealed carry. It’s a touch thinner, making it easier to hide.

I think the Glock is more versatile overall, especially because it holds more rounds. When I need a backup, I appreciate the extra capacity in stressful situations!

Totally! But let’s not forget the aesthetics of the Micro 9. It looks great! However, can we really compromise safety for style?

4 Likes

In a self-defense scenario, I favor reliability over looks. The Glock has never let me down. Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison, really?

8 Likes

Right? I feel like users often overlook that aspect. But on a lighter note, if the Kimber were a vehicle, it’d definitely be a classic sports car—looks great but temperamental!

I’ve found the Kimber Micro 9’s grip really comfortable, especially for smaller hands. The contours fit perfectly, which makes handling easy during extended use!

1 Like

That’s interesting! The Glock 43 has a bit more heft to it, which I think helps with stability. However, it can feel bulky on longer carries.

I’ve tried both guns at the range. The Glock 43 feels lighter, but the trigger on the Micro 9 is smoother, which contributes to better accuracy. Anyone else notice that?

Absolutely! But I’ve also noticed that the Micro 9 allows for better grip customization with its backstraps. It makes a big difference for extended sessions.

For me, the weight distribution of the Micro 9 is key. It doesn’t pull my waistband down like the Glock can sometimes do. I prefer comfort over the slightly increased firepower of the Glock.

That’s a good point! I’ve had the same issue with the Glock. Sometimes I wonder why gun manufacturers don’t consider comfort more.

I think it all comes down to personal preference. The Micro 9 is definitely more stylish, but the Glock 43’s reputation for reliability is hard to overlook, too.

True! But if aesthetics matter to you, the Micro 9 definitely wins that battle. Who says guns can’t be pretty?

I’m curious about the recoil management. How does the recoil feel on both? Is one easier to handle than the other after a few rounds?