I’m in the market for a compact .380 handgun and I’ve been torn between the Glock 42 and the Sig Sauer P365-380. I thought it would be helpful to gather some insights from others who might have experience with either or both of these models.
Overview of the Guns
Glock 42
The Glock 42 has a reputation for being reliable and easy to handle. Here are some of the key specs and features:
Caliber: .380 ACP
Capacity: 6+1 rounds
Weight: Approximately 13.76 ounces (unloaded)
Size: Compact and lightweight, great for concealed carry
Sig Sauer P365-380
The P365-380 has been praised for its innovative design and comfort. Important specs include:
Caliber: .380 ACP
Capacity: 10+1 rounds
Weight: About 17.8 ounces (unloaded)
Size: Slightly larger than the Glock 42, but still comfortably concealable
Key Considerations
When choosing between these two firearms, here are a few aspects I’m particularly interested in:
1. Recoil Management
Glock 42: Known for its manageable recoil thanks to its low weight, making it a good option for beginners or those sensitive to recoil.
P365-380: Touted for its ability to handle recoil well due to its design, providing a more consistent shooting experience.
2. Size and Comfort
Glock 42: Ideal for concealed carry, its slim profile fits nicely against the body.
P365-380: While it’s slightly bulkier, the additional grip length can enhance handling and shooting.
3. Ammo Capacity
Glock 42: Limited to 6 rounds, which is adequate but may feel restrictive in a self-defense scenario.
P365-380: Offering 10+1 capacity gives that extra security during critical moments.
Personal Experience
I’ve read a lot of reviews but would love to hear personal experiences. How do these two compare in real-world situations? Which one do you prefer for everyday carry and why?
Conclusion
Ultimately, I’m looking for a reliable firearm that I can feel comfortable carrying every day without compromising on safety or functionality. Your insights would be invaluable in helping me decide between these two options. Looking forward to your thoughts!
I’ve shot both the Glock 42 and the P365-380. In my experience, the P365 has better accuracy, especially at longer distances. The Glock feels a bit snappier in recoil, though.
That’s interesting! I found that the Glock 42’s recoil is manageable for most shooters, but on follow-up shots, the P365-380 allows for quicker recovery and better control.
I’ve been carrying the Glock 42 for a while now, and I find it really comfortable for daily carry. The slim profile makes it easy to hide under a t-shirt. How does the P365-380 compare in terms of size?
Grip comfort is crucial for me too! The Glock 42 has a decent grip, but when I tried the P365-380, I felt a noticeable difference. It’s just molded better to my hand shape.
I’m torn! I’ve heard both sides. Glock has reliability, but P365-380 is newer and seems to be designed with comfort in mind. How do they stack up on ease of use when shooting?
In terms of ease of use, I’d say both are pretty user-friendly. The Glock 42 has a simpler operation for beginners, while the P365-380 feels a bit snappier during recoil. It’s a trade-off depending on your style.
Both have their pros! Glock 42’s minimal weight makes it super convenient for all-day carry. I can hardly feel it on me. What’s the weight difference between these two again?