Anyone hunting with the .277 Fury? Need some advice!

Hunting with Firearms
1

I’ve been hearing a lot about the .277 Fury cartridge, especially how it’s being marketed towards hunting applications, and I’m really curious about it. I’m considering getting into hunting, and this cartridge seems to be gaining some traction. However, I want to gather more insights before making any decisions.

What I’m Looking For

  1. Performance: How does the .277 Fury compare to other well-known hunting cartridges like the .308 Winchester or the 6.5 Creedmoor?
  2. Firearms: What are some reliable firearms that can chamber the .277 Fury? I want to make sure I have a good option that’s suited for hunting.
  3. Ballistics: I’ve heard that the ballistic performance of the .277 Fury is impressive. Can someone break down the details? What kind of range and stopping power can I expect?
  4. Usage Tips: Any recommendations on using the .277 Fury for hunting different game? Are there particular practices or tips that can enhance my effectiveness in the field?

Community Input

If you have experience with the .277 Fury, I’d love to hear your thoughts! What has your experience been in the field, and do you think it’s worth pursuing as a primary cartridge for hunting? Any pros and cons you can share would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance for your advice!

1 Like
2

I’ve been using the .277 Fury for a while now, and I’ve had great success with the 150 grain ELD-X bullets. They really perform well on deer!

4 Likes
3

What powder charges have you found best to pair with those ELD-X bullets?

4

I agree with mark! The ELD-X bullets expand beautifully. For powder, I’ve had great results with H4350 around 56 grains.

5

56 grains? That’s a little hot for my taste! I usually stick to 54 grains for a safer margin, especially with the way these rifles can behave under pressure.

6

I hear you, but have you tried working up slowly to see if it provides better accuracy?

7

I’m curious about using lighter bullets. Has anyone tried the 130 grain AccuBond? How do they perform on bigger game?

8

The AccuBond is a solid choice, especially for elk! Some claim they produce better terminal ballistics with the Fury’s velocity.

5 Likes
9

I’ve been thinking about them. What kind of groups do you get with the AccuBond?

3 Likes
10

I get about 0.75 MOA with the 130 grain AccuBond at 2950 fps, but it took a bit of tuning to get there.

11

Tuning is key! You know, the .277 Fury is still fairly new to the market. It’s exciting to see how different loads perform.

12

For sure! But I wish they had a wider selection of bullets out already. It can be frustrating trying to find what works best.

13

Haha, yeah! The only clear winner so far is our patience while we wait for more options! But seriously, let’s test and share info!

14

That’s a good point! I’d love to hear updates as more people experiment. Any final tips for new shooters trying to get into the .277 Fury?

6 Likes
15

I’m considering the .277 Fury for my next hunt too. I’ve read it’s designed for low recoil and high velocity, which could be a game changer compared to the .308. Anyone else feel the same?

16

I agree! The .277 Fury’s ballistics are impressive, especially for longer ranges. It seems to bridge the gap between lighter calibers and heavy hitters like the .30-06.

17

I’ve used .308 for years but the .277 Fury intrigued me with its lighter recoil. How does it perform on bigger game like elk?

18

The Fury performs well against elk! Its design and energy retainment give it a solid edge. I think recoil is manageable, especially for women or younger hunters.

19

That sounds promising! Can we compare it more closely to something like the 6.5 Creedmoor? How does the effective range stack up?

6 Likes
20

The 6.5 Creedmoor has a great reputation for precision, but the .277 Fury has the edge on velocity. In the field, it really depends on your shooting style and terrain.

5 Likes