I’m looking to dive into the differences between the .17 HMR (Hornady Magnum Rimfire) and the .22 LR (Long Rifle) cartridges as I gear up for some varmint hunting this season. Both cartridges have their enthusiasts, and I want to understand the pros and cons of each to make an informed choice.
Performance Comparison
Velocity: The .17 HMR typically has a higher velocity than the .22 LR, which translates to flatter trajectories over longer distances. Is this significant enough for small game?
Accuracy: I’ve heard that .17 HMR might have better accuracy at longer ranges. Has anyone here confirmed this with actual shooting experiences?
Effective Range: How do these two cartridges stack up when it comes to effective range for various types of small game?
Suitability for Hunting
With varmint hunting, the choice of caliber can greatly affect success. Here are some factors I’m considering:
Game Size: What’s the general consensus on using .17 HMR versus .22 LR for various small animals like squirrels, rabbits, and even coyotes? Is one more humane than the other?
Noise Level: The .22 LR is often quieter than the .17 HMR. For those of you who hunt in areas where noise is a concern, does this factor into your choice?
User Experiences
I’d love to hear from those who have used both. What have your experiences been like? If you had to choose one for a specific scenario, what would it be and why? Any recommendations for particular brands of ammunition that you trust?
Concluding Thoughts
Ultimately, I’m hoping to gather enough insights to choose a round that not only meets my hunting needs but also enhances my shooting experience. Thank you in advance for your help, and I look forward to your thoughts!
I’ve had great experiences with the .17 HMR for varmint hunting. It’s known for its accuracy and flat trajectory. I shoot effectively out to 200 yards with it. The .22 LR, while cheaper, just can’t match that range or precision in my experience.
I can vouch for the .22 LR’s effectiveness, especially up to 100 yards. It’s a solid option for close-range shooting, and the ammo is easier to find and less expensive! Just depends on your hunting style.
I mostly use .17 HMR because of its superior velocity. When hunting smaller varmints, the extra power means more effective kills. However, it does come with a higher price tag for ammo. Just a thought!
Accuracy is key! I find that the .17 HMR has a tighter grouping than the .22 LR, especially at longer distances. If you’re looking for precision, I’d recommend the .17.
True, but let’s not forget the .22 LR’s amazing versatility. It’s great for all types of varmint hunting, making it a well-rounded choice for many hunters.
I think both have their place in a hunter’s arsenal. The .17 HMR works wonderfully for long shots, while the .22 LR is fantastic up close. Plus, I can’t resist those days at the range with .22s!
Absolutely! Because of its velocity and higher ballistic coefficient, the .17 HMR tends to drift less and maintain its accuracy in wind. I’ve noticed it myself!
In the end, I’d recommend trying both if possible. I’ve enjoyed moments with my .17 HMR but also have fond memories with the .22 LR. It just depends on the setting and what you enjoy!
If cost is a major factor for you, .22 LR tends to be more budget-friendly. You can usually find boxes for less than half the price of .17 HMR. Plus, .22 LR ammo is more widely available across different regions.
I’ve noticed that .17 HMR can be a bit harder to find in some areas. It might depend on where you’re located, but I’ve had better luck getting .22 LR at local shops.
I completely agree with both of you! However, while .22 LR is cheaper, don’t underestimate the power of .17 HMR for longer distances. The performance can justify the cost for some hunters.
I’ve found that it varies by location! In my area, .22 LR is all over the place, but .17 HMR can be hit or miss. It’s definitely good to check your local stores.